At any rate, now that I've gotten that hackwad out of my throat, TalkLeft has a comment on Att'y Turley's article on Herr John's attacks on civil liberties (that he says is a big fat smelly liberal lie - see two posts previous).
Ashcroft vs. Greenpeace
Don't miss GW Law Professor Jonathan Turley's op-ed in the LA Times, "Students, Nuns and Sailor-Mongers, Beware: Ashcroft is pulling out all the stops to prosecute protesters."
Turley takes Ashcroft on for the Miami prosecution of Greenpeace under an obscure law (last week we wrote about the details of the case ). Turley opines:
The Greenpeace case is particularly chilling because of the extraordinary effort to find a law that could be used to pursue the organization. The 1872 law is a legal relic that must have required much archeological digging through law books to find.
The extraordinary effort made to find and use this obscure law strongly suggests a campaign of selective prosecution - the greatest scourge of the 1st Amendment. Greenpeace was engaged in a classic protest used by countless organizations, from those of the civil rights movement to anti-abortion groups. It is a way for citizens to express their opposition by literally standing in the path of the government.
...Unless deterred by Congress or the courts, Ashcroft will continue his campaign to protect Americans from the ravages of free speech. If he succeeds, it will not be sailors but free speech that will be shanghaied in Miami.
And, do you need to read any more about the inexcusable, wretched treatment this troop-supporting country is giving its patriot soldiers? Try this UPI story.
....but hey, do what you want....you will anyway.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are moderated. There may be some delay before your comment is published. It all depends on how much time M has in the day. But please comment!