More Kerry

If you didn't catch my post about trying to reconcile some of Kerry's conflicting positions, his membership in Skull & Bones, and his politicking for secrecy, it's here.

And here's a little more of similar Kerry politicking:

June 20, 2003: Senator John Kerry says he - in fact "every one of us" - was misled by President Bush concerning Iraq having weapons of mass destruction. And he says the deception is one reason he is running for President

The BBC reports on Kerry's realization that he had been lied to and his determination that he will not let President Bush "off the hook."

If John Kerry had been interested in the truth, why did he refuse to meet with his Western Mass constituents before voting for the war resolution? Why did he close his Springfield office on October 11 - shutting out his constituents - in the aftermath of his vote in favor of war? Link.

...In October, 2002, 23 Senators and 133 Representatives voted against the Bush Administration's war resolution. John Kerry voted for it. What did 156 Members of Congress know that Kerry did not know? Hundreds, perhaps thousands, of his constituents had called him, urging him to vote against war. After he voted for war, over 20,000 constituents wrote in the name of Randall Forsberg, who ran against him in a last minute write-in anti-war campaign in November.

During the lead up to war, much came to light in terms of US and UK deceptions concerning the weapons of mass destruction allegations. Surely, Senator Kerry took note of these developments.  article

Sure he did. They all knew. Or could have known. We knew.

Kerry may be better than Bush, but just barely.

If you insist on playing the game as though it weren't fixed, find the candidate who voted against the war - who didn't accept the lies, who wasn't afraid to be a patriot.

....but hey, do what you want....you will anyway.