"Bush knew - but so did Kerry"

Al Giordano reports:

Charles Jenks of the Traprock Peace Center in Deerfield, Massachusetts, says it is all well and good that John Kerry says the American people were misled by Bush claims of Weapons of Mass Destruction in Iraq, but that Kerry should not be able to claim, now, that he, the Senator, was personally misled.

There was plenty of evidence prior to the Senate vote that Bush was cooking the books.

Jenks writes:

If John Kerry had been interested in the truth, why did he refuse to meet with his Western Mass constituents before voting for the war resolution?

...Before his vote, on September 30, a group of his constituents, including this writer, met with his foreign policy aide...

There, says Jenks, Kerry's staff was given the evidence that Bush's claimed evidence was false, days prior to Kerry's casting of a vote in favor of the Iraq attack.

Personally, I think they all knew - or could have known. And if they didn't know, then shame on them. Every independent journalist with a website knew. Every left-leaning blogger knew. If those overworked politicians can't find the time to read some alternative news sources and monitor those on the internet, surely they have an aid who can. Or just what is it they have their aids doing? Oh, yeah. Well, that's just the Democrats. What's the Republicans' excuse?

Read the rest of it.

....or do what you want....you will anyway.