Ding Ding Ding Ding Ding

Good answer!

I'm coming late to Barack Obama's presser. For the most part, he's sounding very reasonable and thoughtful.

They are not playing softball with him, and yet he doesn't sound annoyed at them and petulant like his predecessor always did on the rare occassion someone asked him something that he hadn't pre-approved. But Obama's not letting them stone him, either.

What a joy to hear our president talk to other people as though they might also be intelligent and thoughtful. And yet, if they don't want to have that kind of conversation...

Somebody with a hardon for a dustup asked him why it took him two days to express outrage about the AIG bonuses. After an actual explanation, the guy demanded to know, "But why did it take a couple of days so long?" Whereupon Obama cut straight and curt, "It took a couple of days because I like to know what I'm talking about before I speak." Unlike you, Asshat. Next question.

Nice block.

Update: Politico has the clip.

Update Tuesday: As could have been predicted, the buzz is all about this Obama quip, but leaving out the prelude exchange where he'd made an effort to respond to the guy's question. Reports are making it appear as though the guy asked a reasonable question (which he did - "Why'd it take two days to respond?") and Obama slapped him down without giving him a courteous response. That would have been the petulant little pissant before Obama who would have done that, folks.

It would have been a good answer anyway.

Update: Transcript

And the "couple of days" exchange:

QUESTION: Thank you. Mr. President. You spoke again at the top about your anger about AIG. You've been saying that for days now. But why is it that it seems Andrew Cuomo seems to be in New York getting more actual action on it?

And when you and Secretary Geithner first learned about this 10 days, two weeks ago, you didn't go public immediately with that outrage. You waited a few days. And then when -- you went public after you realized Secretary Geithner really had no legal avenue to stop it.

And, more broadly, I just want to follow up on Chip and Jake. You've been very critical of President Bush doubling the national debt. And, to be fair, it's not just Republicans hitting you. Democrat Kent Conrad, as you know, said, quote, "When I look at this budget, I see the debt doubling again."

You keep saying that you've inherited a big fiscal mess. Do you worry, though, that your daughters, not to mention the next president, will be inheriting an even bigger fiscal mess if the spending goes out of control?

OBAMA: Of course I do, Ed, which is why we're doing everything we can to reduce that deficit. Look, if this were easy, then, you know, we would have already had it done, and the budget would have been voted on, and everybody could go home. This is hard.

And the reason it's hard is because we've accumulated a structural deficit that's going to take a long time, and we're not going to be able to do it next year or the year after or three years from now. What we have to do is bend the curve on these deficit projections. And the best way for us to do that is to reduce healthcare costs. That's not just my opinion. That's the opinion of almost every single person who has looked at our long-term fiscal situation.

Now, how do we -- how are we going to reduce healthcare costs? Because the problem is not just in government-run programs. The problem is in the private sector, as well. It's experienced by families. It's experienced by businesses.

And so what we've said is, look, let's invest in health information technologies. Let's invest in preventive care. Let's invest in mechanisms that look at who's doing a better job controlling costs while producing good quality outcomes in various states and let's reimburse on the basis of improved quality, as opposed to simply how many procedures you're doing. Let's do a whole host of things, some of which cost money on the front end but offer the prospect of reducing costs on the back end.

Now, the alternative is to stand pat and to simply say, "We are just going to not invest in healthcare. We're not going to take on energy. We'll wait until the next time that gas gets to $4 a gallon. We will not improve our schools. And we'll allow China or India or other countries to lap our young people in terms of their performance. We will settle on lower growth rates, and we will continue to contract, both as an economy and our ability to -- to provide a better life for our kids."

That, I don't think, is the better option. Now, am I completely satisfied with all the work that needs to be done on deficits? No. That's why I convened a fiscal responsibility summit -- that started in this room -- to start looking at entitlements and to start looking at the big drivers of costs over the long term. Not all of those are reflected in our budget, partly because the savings we anticipate would be coming in years outside of the 10-year budget cycle that we're talking about. OK?

QUESTION: But on AIG, why did you wait -- why did you wait days to come out and express that outrage? It seems like the action is coming out of New York and the attorney general's office. It took you days to come public with Secretary Geithner and say, "Look, we're outraged." Why did it take so long?

OBAMA: It took us a couple of days because I like to know what I'm talking about before I speak.

Just for the record, I would suggest Obama never use the phrase "this is hard." It's much to reminiscent of the whiny little POS before him always excusing his incompetence by reminding us that preznintin' is hard work.