[...]
The unclassified forecasts offer a range of scenarios about the world 15 years on. Officials caution they are not meant to be predictions certain to come true but rather long-term outlooks designed to stimulate debate.
Al Qaeda was never more than a scare word for U.S. warhawks. Murky and scattered terror cells was all it ever was. But they're sure right about the loss of superpowerdom. China, I think will get its turn.
[National Intelligence Council] vice-chairman David Gordon said the changes ahead could be "a very bumpy ride."
I'd say there's a real good possibility for that.
And I'd also say that the new players are competitive. All players are competitive. But the biggest non-cooperator is not China or India, but the U.S. In all the global treaties and talks, the U.S. often stands alone defiantly throwing her weight around.
Before you get too worried about what the council has come up with, however, consider its further analysis:
If by progress they mean wholesale destruction, then maybe. And I'm sure other "repressive regimes" have not failed to take note of the "example" being set in those two countries.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are moderated. There may be some delay before your comment is published. It all depends on how much time M has in the day. But please comment!